<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[@Valeriy Kuchin - blog]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[As a student I played on a guitar in a college music band during three years. But after college I stringed the guitar on a wall and founded my own business. It was a lot times ago. In 2006 I suddenly got a desire to make musik again.

Now I have nine albums with more then 80 songs.
I think my music can improve a mood for everybody.
DISCOGRAPHY:
-The Beginning
-Tamptation
-Turn Back to the Future
-Lost Hero
-Dreams
-Wonderland
-Nova
-Terra Incognita
-Sexy Boy
]]></description>
        <link>https://localbandz.com/valeriy-kuchin</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 18:51:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <atom:link href="https://localbandz.com/feed/blog/valeriy-kuchin" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Valeriy Kuchin - @valeriy-kuchin]]></title>
                <link>https://localbandz.com/valeriy-kuchin/blog/61/valeriy-kuchin</link>
                <guid>https://localbandz.com/valeriy-kuchin/blog/61</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Complimentary Feedback<br><br>
Name<br><br>
<br><br>
Valery Kuchin<br><br>
. Song Title Oriental Love<br><br>
Style Rock<br><br>
Title<br><br>
<br><br>
Not sure what it had to do with the music or style.<br><br>
<br><br>
Overall Comments:<br><br>
<br><br>
Valery - Hi there and thanks for sending in Oriental Love. It had a great Stones-y groove and electric rhythm guitar sound a la Street Fight.fn!J~Man· I-Iwlf--expectecLt~ hear Mick Jagger after the intro!<br><br>
<br><br>
Drums were excellent as well, with a tight punchy sound and strong performance. Loved the interjections of the Leslie sounding guitar. The guitars worked very well in a minimalist way.<br>
Melody<br><br>
<br><br>
181 Good music in verses<br><br>
<br><br>
o Verses could be stronger 181 Good music in choruses<br><br>
<br><br>
Choruses Gould be stronger<br><br>
Verses/Choruses sound too similar<br><br>
Memorable "hook"<br><br>
Hook not obvious enough<br><br>
No stated melody, per se. More implied by the chord voicings ..<br><br>
<br><br>
Structure<br><br>
<br><br>
D Intro too long<br><br>
<br><br>
181 Well-written structure<br><br>
<br><br>
Good sectional contrast<br><br>
Not enough sectional contrast<br><br>
Could use a bridge<br><br>
Moved well from section to section.<br><br>
Lyric<br><br>
<br><br>
First line makes me want to hear more<br><br>
Engaging<br><br>
Cohesive<br><br>
Good use of imagery DRhymes well<br><br>
Communicates emotion to listener<br><br>
Lacks focus<br><br>
Unique<br><br>
Too abstract<br><br>
I don't understand it<br><br>
Too predictable<br><br>
Too many cliches<br><br>
Awkward phrasing (see comments below)<br><br>
Vocal does help to sell song<br><br>
Vocal does not help to sell song<br><br>
The viola (?) added a cool touch to the arrangement, as did the fiddle later. The electronic bleeps were another fun touch. I wasn't quite sure about the breakdown section near the end, which seemed to lose some steam &amp; was happy when the guitars reentered. Great stuff, Valery! No lyrics involved. There were some spoken bits near the end but I couldn't tell what they were saying.<br><br>
Overal.1 Bating .- .--.~- ,-- .. _-.............,._ .. _-.--,<br><br>
These numerical scores are an indication of your relative strengths and weaknesses, and do not determine whether or not the song is forwarded.<br><br>
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (10=best)<br><br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Music<br><br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 Lyrics<br><br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 Marketability<br><br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 Arrangement<br><br>
0 0 ·0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 Production<br><br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 0 Engineering<br><br>
Note: The comments and numerical scores on this sheet are meant as helpful, objective information and are not used to determine whether or not your music should be forwarded. Each listing has lJnique criteria and submissions are considered with those in mind. This is just one person's opinion, albeit an informed one. There are many informed opinions on any given work. So, pro or con, don't let it change your life! © TAXI 1992, 1996, 2002.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:43:30 -0500</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Valeriy Kuchin - @valeriy-kuchin]]></title>
                <link>https://localbandz.com/valeriy-kuchin/blog/60/valeriy-kuchin</link>
                <guid>https://localbandz.com/valeriy-kuchin/blog/60</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Complimentary Feedback<br><br>
Name<br><br>
<br><br>
Valery Kuchin<br><br>
. Song Title Oriental Love<br><br>
Style Rock<br><br>
Title<br><br>
<br><br>
Not sure what it had to do with the music or style.<br><br>
<br><br>
Overall Comments:<br><br>
<br><br>
Valery - Hi there and thanks for sending in Oriental Love. It had a great Stones-y groove and electric rhythm guitar sound a la Street Fight.fn!J~Man· I-Iwlf--expectecLt~ hear Mick Jagger after the intro!<br><br>
<br><br>
Drums were excellent as well, with a tight punchy sound and strong performance. Loved the interjections of the Leslie sounding guitar. The guitars worked very well in a minimalist way.Melody<br><br>
<br><br>
181 Good music in verses<br><br>
<br><br>
o Verses could be stronger 181 Good music in choruses<br><br>
<br><br>
Choruses Gould be stronger<br><br>
Verses/Choruses sound too similar<br><br>
Memorable "hook"<br><br>
Hook not obvious enough<br><br>
No stated melody, per se. More implied by the chord voicings ..<br><br>
<br><br>
Structure<br><br>
<br><br>
D Intro too long<br><br>
<br><br>
181 Well-written structure<br><br>
<br><br>
Good sectional contrast<br><br>
Not enough sectional contrast<br><br>
Could use a bridge<br><br>
Moved well from section to section.<br><br>
Lyric<br><br>
<br><br>
First line makes me want to hear more<br><br>
Engaging<br><br>
Cohesive<br><br>
Good use of imagery DRhymes well<br><br>
Communicates emotion to listener<br><br>
Lacks focus<br><br>
Unique<br><br>
Too abstract<br><br>
I don't understand it<br><br>
Too predictable<br><br>
Too many cliches<br><br>
Awkward phrasing (see comments below)<br><br>
Vocal does help to sell song<br><br>
Vocal does not help to sell song<br><br>
The viola (?) added a cool touch to the arrangement, as did the fiddle later. The electronic bleeps were another fun touch. I wasn't quite sure about the breakdown section near the end, which seemed to lose some steam &amp; was happy when the guitars reentered. Great stuff, Valery! No lyrics involved. There were some spoken bits near the end but I couldn't tell what they were saying.<br><br>
Overal.1 Bating .- .--.~- ,-- .. _-.............,._ .. _-.--,<br><br>
These numerical scores are an indication of your relative strengths and weaknesses, and do not determine whether or not the song is forwarded.<br><br>
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (10=best)<br><br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Music<br><br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 Lyrics<br><br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 Marketability<br><br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 Arrangement<br><br>
0 0 ·0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 Production<br><br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 0 0 Engineering<br><br>
Note: The comments and numerical scores on this sheet are meant as helpful, objective information and are not used to determine whether or not your music should be forwarded. Each listing has lJnique criteria and submissions are considered with those in mind. This is just one person's opinion, albeit an informed one. There are many informed opinions on any given work. So, pro or con, don't let it change your life! © TAXI 1992, 1996, 2002.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:40:42 -0500</pubDate>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>